Looking for:
Acdsee pro 8 trial free |
Acdsee pro 8 trial free
Acdsee pro 8 trial free
I've lost faith in the company. I had used an earlier version of the basic ACDSee image managers but got sufficiently annoyed because they would not update their RAW converters database once a newer version became available, making the one I purchased useless for working with newer cameras.
The RAW converter updates were freely available to download but would not work with the no longer freshest version. It was not a technical compatibility issue, but a business decision. FastStone is extremely fast, with a great interface and does some very good basic image editing.
I would rather donate money to these programs than to keep having to purchase ACDSee annually or purchase a subscription.
Holy cow, what did I miss? I'm still ysing Pro5. LR is amazing for editing volume, but ACDSee is still the best at organizing, burning, doing batch actions like resizing and watermarking and sharpening all at the same time.
And batch renaming. Ever since about v4, ACDsee started cramming "feature" upon "feature" into what was once the best, fastest and lightest image viewer available. Nowdays it's over It's just rediculous.
Especially the "pro" version. If "pro" means a product is intended for professionals, then it's safe to asume they're using OTHER professional tools to edit and organize their photos.
I have never ever used an "edit" funcion in ACDsee. All I want is is a super fast image viewer that instantly opens up any image file format and can equally quickly scroll through hundreds of images.
And that's it. Unfortunately, ACDsee has steered away from performance and seems to be focused on being the jack of all trades, when all we need is a master of one: speed. If you don't need the advanced features in the PRO version for developing your raw images or editing jpgs why not go for the cheaper non pro version with less features, or just use that that old version you have, or any other viewer of your choice.
I think you are spot on with your own comment saying ACDSee is "fast enough". I want FAST, not "fast enough". And it's not about pro vs non-pro or cost. Cost isn't the issue and they are both equal in speed. That it's selling point. And it was good and fast enough at it. Because with all due respect for ACDSee, Lightroom is of course a way more advanced platform for a photography workflow and editing. Most users I know have a 2-step workflow.
First use a fast tool to go through the first selection proces and then import the rest into Lightroom. Being the absolute fastest in speeding up that workflow. Peter v. Nice to have it all in one tool! One thing ACDSee doesn't have is working with layers like photoshop can, pity. What do you think is even better in LR? I have a very high specced workstation certainly no issues there, and sure, ACDSee is fairly fast, basic scrolling through resized jpg images isn't much too worry.
But the thumb building sure isn't fast with Raws and large tiffs and the initial tree building when having a lot folders and of images in the folder is slow and crashes are still common. And speed is subjective of course. What you find fast enough might be slow in my perception. Now -that- is really fast, makes ACDSee feel like a turtle..
I'm not saying they shouldn't try to make it an all-in-one tool. Nice for sure for certain users will have a broader sell. The only thing I'd like to see is tool developers in general focus on really speeding up their tool. Everybody wants speed. Not everybody wants all their new features. But that's not only ACDSee btw.
When I look at my raw images on the hard disk, their thumbs appear almost instantaneously because I use the database feature in ACDSee called "catalogue folders" or somthing like that, I'm translating here from the German version This feature goes through all selected folders and creates the thumbnails for each image on the disk.
It can take a few hours, if you have thousands of images like I do, but it is only done once, while I'm sleeping, and then afterwards those thumbs all appear instantly. Only faststone. Its free and fast. Stoped using acdsee when it was 10 ver. I've got to say, I'm underwhelmed. The interesting changes are for the users of the edit tab the 'destrcutive', bit mapped editor. Nothing really new there for the person who shoots raw. If you haven't used ACDSee Pro before, using this will be a great experience, because it's a good product.
But frankly, the reason to upgrade from Pro 7 to Pro 8 seems non-existent for me as an existing user. They've tried to incorporate their 'online' drive service a bit more seamlessly into the overall user interface, which is nice if you are a user of that service, I guess, but considering the recent price reductions for Google Drive and others, it seems pretty pricey to me.
Too pricey IMO. I might recommend interested people to try the editing allowed by color selection They call it 'pixel targeting'. I don't use ACDSee but my software does allow me to edit some by color and that is very nice because I don't have to make masks unless I want to further restrict the adjustment. Now, if the color edits are on destructive layers I presumed they were effective with RAW. That is the best way to use them There is already a similar process in the raw development.
This is really just a catch up for the bit mapped editor. Do you mean there is already something like the 'pixel targeting' in the raw development mode of ver PRO7? At this point, I am inclined to say that I am uncertain what pixel targeting actually brings to the table in practical terms. My unproven suspicion is, that it brings just a different user interface to an existing set of color algorithms.
That isn't a bad thing, sometimes a different UI can make things easier for some people. But at this point, I'm not sure that it adds NEW functionality. I am continuing to test and evaluate. My suspicions may be faulty and am willing to retract if I'm proven wrong.
It is easy to use and works well for my needs. So no OS-X compatibility then There is a version 3 for Mac available for latest OS. The windows versions now at version 8 has the most developed features. However for the low cost of either software definitely worth buying. There is also an online interface for sharing photos I really like. Try the trial version to see if you like it. All have their specific uses for what I do.
Well, being able to work with color selections, Pixel Targeting, will be nice. I think many people will like this. More and more, I wish manufactures would group 'stuff that makes auto decisions' from 'new stuff that lets you do different things'.
Lightroom supports the X trans cameras version 5 , not sure on earlier versions of Lightroom, and of course the bundled Raw converter that comes with the Fuji camera - Silkypix I think it is. Maybe in future?
Anyone know? Steelhead3: The Fuji X cameras are hardly "off-brand" at this point. I like the program as a viewer, but the fact that it can't show X-Pro 1 or X20 raw files is pathetic. If you use these cameras, I would suggest looking somewhere else. Their rotation tool is a good example. I also like their crop tool and other features in Edit mode.
I have not yet tried this latest version, but I am headed that way now. Just a note. The reason for the high speed rendering of an image in Acdsee, is because it is set to display the embedded jpg image from the raw file by default.
If high quality decode is selected in Acdsee, it is still around twice as fast as Lightroom at loading an image. I've mentioned this already in the past on your feedback forum, after the version 6 and 7 came along, that an update of your database would make sense. Perhaps you can now update your database to show PRO 8 is here!
I just downloaded the trial version of Acdsee Pro 8 and it is really, really fast at loading the large raw image files from my D There's also improvements been made to existing technology on previous versions. In this full review, we take a look at the new and improved features. Downloading from the ACDSee website takes only a few moments to get the preliminary files. Downloading from those took us up to 25 minutes and actually installing the program onto our computer took just a couple of minutes.
Upon launching Pro 8, you'll be given the chance to input an activation key if you've bought the product. However, click Trial if you're seeing if it's for you. We input the code, logged into our ACDSee account and the program opened. It immediately detected a previous version from when we reviewed Pro 7 in July and opened up the Convert tool to transfer the database from Pro 7 to Pro 8. However, it's non-destructive and won't delete your Pro 7 files. One push of a button operates the Convert tool and the whole operation took us around 2 minutes.
As with Pro 7, the program is split into five sections with the Manage section being the opening page. From here, you can navigate to a folder of images you want to edit.
To the right of the thumbnail images - which come up when a folder containing pictures is opened — you can edit the metadata, categorise and view picture details. Basic shooting data is in a small box to the right under the navigation box, but has been pushed to the bottom to make way for the new SeeDrive feature.
Covert Ops. Internet Tools. Linux Distros. MajorGeeks Windows Tweaks. System Tools. Smart Defrag. K-Lite Mega Codec Pack. Snappy Driver Installer. Sergei Strelec's WinPE. K-Lite Codec Pack Update. Mozilla Firefox. Booo 2. Not Geeky 3. Average 4. Good 5.
❿
No comments:
Post a Comment